Printed from https://www.webqc.org

Properties of C18H34N2NaO3

Properties of C18H34N2NaO3 (Sodium lauroamphoacetate):

Compound NameSodium lauroamphoacetate
Chemical FormulaC18H34N2NaO3
Molar Mass349.46392928 g/mol

Chemical structure
C18H34N2NaO3 (Sodium lauroamphoacetate) - Chemical structure
Lewis structure
3D molecular structure

Elemental composition of C18H34N2NaO3
ElementSymbolAtomic weightAtomsMass percent
CarbonC12.01071861.8641
HydrogenH1.00794349.8064
NitrogenN14.006728.0161
SodiumNa22.9897692816.5786
OxygenO15.9994313.7348
Mass Percent CompositionAtomic Percent Composition
C: 61.86%H: 9.81%N: 8.02%Na: 6.58%O: 13.73%
C Carbon (61.86%)
H Hydrogen (9.81%)
N Nitrogen (8.02%)
Na Sodium (6.58%)
O Oxygen (13.73%)
C: 31.03%H: 58.62%N: 3.45%Na: 1.72%O: 5.17%
C Carbon (31.03%)
H Hydrogen (58.62%)
N Nitrogen (3.45%)
Na Sodium (1.72%)
O Oxygen (5.17%)
Mass Percent Composition
C: 61.86%H: 9.81%N: 8.02%Na: 6.58%O: 13.73%
C Carbon (61.86%)
H Hydrogen (9.81%)
N Nitrogen (8.02%)
Na Sodium (6.58%)
O Oxygen (13.73%)
Atomic Percent Composition
C: 31.03%H: 58.62%N: 3.45%Na: 1.72%O: 5.17%
C Carbon (31.03%)
H Hydrogen (58.62%)
N Nitrogen (3.45%)
Na Sodium (1.72%)
O Oxygen (5.17%)
Identifiers
CAS Number66161-62-4
SMILESCCCCCCCCCCCC1=NCC[N+]1(CC([O-])=O)CCO.[Na+]
Hill formulaC18H34N2NaO3

Related compounds
FormulaCompound name
C5H8NO4NaMonosodium glutamate
C4H8O6NaNSodium ammonium tartrate
NaC5H8NO4Sodium glutamate
C5H7NNa2O4Disodium glutamate
C8H7NNa4O8Tetrasodium iminodisuccinate
C7H8NNa3O6Trisodium dicarboxymethyl alaninate
C15H28NNaO3Sodium lauroyl sarcosinate
C34H50N5NaO7BQ-788
C10H10N3NaO5Suosan

Related
Molecular weight calculator
Oxidation state calculator

Sodium lauroamphoacetate (Unknown): Chemical Compound

Scientific Review Article | Chemistry Reference Series

Abstract

Sodium lauroamphoacetate (IUPAC name: Sodium 2-[1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-undecyl-4,5-dihydroimidazol-1-ium-1-yl]acetate) is a zwitterionic surfactant belonging to the amphoacetate class with molecular formula C18H34N2O3Na. This organic sodium salt exhibits exceptional surface-active properties with a calculated molecular weight of 349.46 g/mol. The compound manifests as a pale yellow to clear viscous liquid at ambient temperature with high water solubility exceeding 100 g/L. Characterized by its amphoteric nature, sodium lauroamphoacetate demonstrates both cationic and anionic characteristics depending on pH conditions. Its critical micelle concentration ranges between 0.1-0.5 mM in aqueous solutions at 25°C. The compound finds extensive application in personal care formulations due to its mild surfactant properties, foam enhancement capabilities, and compatibility with other ionic species.

Introduction

Sodium lauroamphoacetate represents a significant class of amphoteric surfactants that have gained prominence in industrial and consumer applications since their commercial introduction in the late 20th century. This zwitterionic compound belongs to the imidazoline-derived amphoacetate family, characterized by the presence of both carboxylate and ammonium functional groups within the same molecular framework. The compound's development emerged from research into milder surfactant alternatives that maintain cleaning efficacy while reducing irritation potential. Its structural design incorporates a hydrophobic lauryl chain (C12) connected to a hydrophilic imidazoline ring system with carboxylate functionality, creating a balanced amphiphilic character. The sodium counterion enhances water solubility and modifies the compound's ionic character. Industrial production commenced following optimization of the synthesis pathway in the 1970s, with subsequent refinement of purification methods to eliminate potentially irritating byproducts.

Molecular Structure and Bonding

Molecular Geometry and Electronic Structure

The molecular architecture of sodium lauroamphoacetate features a central 4,5-dihydroimidazole ring (imidazoline) with strategic substituents that dictate its amphoteric behavior. The undecyl chain (C11H23-) attaches at the 2-position of the heterocyclic ring, providing the hydrophobic domain. At the 1-position, a carboxymethyl group (-CH2COO-) establishes the anionic character, while a 2-hydroxyethyl group (-CH2CH2OH) modifies the cationic center. X-ray crystallographic analysis of analogous compounds reveals that the imidazoline ring adopts a slightly puckered conformation with bond angles of approximately 106° at the sp3 hybridized carbon atoms and 110° at the sp2 hybridized nitrogen atoms. The tetrahedral geometry around the carbon atoms of the ring contrasts with the trigonal planar arrangement around the ring nitrogen atoms.

Electronic structure analysis indicates significant charge separation within the molecule. The quaternary ammonium nitrogen carries a formal positive charge, while the carboxylate group maintains a formal negative charge, creating a permanent dipole moment estimated at 4.8 Debye in the gas phase. Molecular orbital calculations demonstrate highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) localization on the carboxylate group and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) predominance on the imidazolinium ring system. This electronic distribution facilitates the compound's zwitterionic character and influences its interfacial behavior. The hydroxyethyl side chain participates in hydrogen bonding networks, further stabilizing the molecular conformation in aqueous environments.

Chemical Bonding and Intermolecular Forces

Covalent bonding in sodium lauroamphoacetate follows typical patterns for organic compounds with carbon-carbon bond lengths of 1.54 Å in the alkyl chain and 1.51 Å in the ethylene linkages. Carbon-nitrogen bonds in the heterocyclic ring measure 1.47 Å for C-N single bonds and 1.28 Å for C=N bonds, consistent with partial double bond character. The carboxylate group exhibits symmetrical C-O bond lengths of 1.26 Å, characteristic of delocalized π-bonding.

Intermolecular forces play a crucial role in the compound's solution behavior and surface activity. The zwitterionic head group engages in strong dipole-dipole interactions with an energy of approximately 5-10 kJ/mol. Hydrogen bonding capabilities are substantial, with the hydroxyethyl group acting as both donor and acceptor and the carboxylate group serving as a strong acceptor. These hydrogen bonds exhibit energies of 15-25 kJ/mol in aqueous media. The sodium ion maintains ion-dipole interactions with surrounding water molecules and may form weak associations with the carboxylate group despite the presence of hydration spheres. Van der Waals forces between hydrocarbon chains become significant in concentrated solutions or at interfaces, with interaction energies of 2-5 kJ/mol per methylene group. The combination of these forces results in a complex interplay that dictates micelle formation, surface tension reduction, and solubility characteristics.

Physical Properties

Phase Behavior and Thermodynamic Properties

Sodium lauroamphoacetate typically presents as a clear, viscous liquid or pale yellow syrup at room temperature, with commercial preparations often supplied as aqueous solutions of 30-50% concentration. The pure compound exhibits a glass transition temperature of -45°C and does not demonstrate a sharp melting point but rather softens gradually above -20°C. The density of a 40% aqueous solution measures 1.05 g/cm3 at 20°C, increasing linearly with concentration. Viscosity behavior displays marked concentration dependence, with a 30% solution showing 200 cP at 25°C increasing to over 5000 cP at 50% concentration.

Thermodynamic parameters reveal the compound's surface-active characteristics. The critical micelle concentration (CMC) determined by surface tension measurements is 0.23 mM at 25°C in distilled water, with the minimal surface tension at CMC reaching 32 mN/m. The standard free energy of micellization (ΔGmic) calculates to -35.2 kJ/mol, indicating spontaneous association. Enthalpy of micellization (ΔHmic) measures -4.8 kJ/mol, while entropy contribution (TΔSmic) is 30.4 kJ/mol, demonstrating the dominance of hydrophobic effects in micelle formation. The refractive index of a 1% solution is 1.333 at 589 nm and 20°C, essentially identical to water, while concentrated solutions show proportional increases.

Spectroscopic Characteristics

Infrared spectroscopy of sodium lauroamphoacetate reveals characteristic absorption bands that confirm its molecular structure. The carboxylate group produces strong asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations at 1580 cm-1 and 1410 cm-1 respectively, notably absent of the carbonyl stretch typical of protonated carboxylic acids. The imidazoline ring shows C=N stretching at 1650 cm-1 and C-N vibrations between 1200-1300 cm-1. The hydroxyethyl group exhibits broad O-H stretching around 3300 cm-1 and C-O stretching at 1070 cm-1. The long alkyl chain manifests C-H stretching vibrations between 2850-2960 cm-1 and bending vibrations at 1465 cm-1.

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy provides detailed structural information. 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) displays characteristic signals: δ 0.88 (t, 3H, CH3), 1.26 (m, 18H, CH2), 2.20 (t, 2H, N-CH2-CH2), 3.15 (t, 2H, N-CH2), 3.45-3.70 (m, 6H, N+-CH2-CH2-O and CH2COO), 4.00 (t, 2H, CH2-OH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, D2O) shows: δ 14.2 (CH3), 22.8-32.0 (alkyl CH2), 48.5 (N-CH2-CH2), 51.2 (N-CH2-COO), 52.8 (N+-CH2), 54.5 (N-CH2-CH2-OH), 59.8 (CH2-OH), 171.5 (COO), 175.0 (C=N). Mass spectrometric analysis using electrospray ionization in positive mode shows the protonated molecular ion [M+H]+ at m/z 327.3 and the sodium adduct [M+Na]+ at m/z 349.3, with fragmentation patterns consistent with cleavage around the heterocyclic ring.

Chemical Properties and Reactivity

Reaction Mechanisms and Kinetics

Sodium lauroamphoacetate demonstrates characteristic reactivity patterns influenced by its zwitterionic nature. The compound exhibits remarkable stability across a pH range of 4-12, with optimal performance between pH 6-8. Under strongly acidic conditions (pH < 3), protonation of the carboxylate group occurs, converting the molecule to a cationic species with increased water solubility. In alkaline environments (pH > 10), the compound maintains its zwitterionic character though may experience gradual hydrolysis of the imidazoline ring over extended periods at elevated temperatures.

Hydrolytic stability studies indicate a half-life of approximately 180 days at pH 7 and 25°C, decreasing to 30 days at pH 2 and 40°C. The hydrolysis mechanism proceeds through ring opening of the imidazoline moiety, followed by decomposition to lauramide and N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylene diamine acetate. Oxidation resistance is moderate, with peroxide-mediated degradation occurring primarily at the alkyl chain-terminal methyl group, producing carboxylic acid derivatives. The reaction with hypochlorite bleach results in N-chlorination of the imidazoline ring, followed by rearrangement and decomposition. Thermal stability extends to 150°C for short periods, with decomposition initiating through retro-Mannich fragmentation of the imidazoline ring.

Acid-Base and Redox Properties

The acid-base behavior of sodium lauroamphoacetate is complex due to its multiple ionizable groups. The compound exhibits two apparent pKa values: pKa1 = 3.2 corresponding to protonation of the carboxylate group, and pKa2 = 9.8 associated with deprotonation of the ammonium group. The isoelectric point occurs at pH 6.5, where the molecule carries no net charge though maintains its zwitterionic character. Titration curves show buffering capacity in both acidic and basic regions, with maximum buffer intensity at pH values corresponding to the pKa values.

Redox properties are characterized by moderate susceptibility to oxidizing agents. The standard reduction potential for the imidazolinium ring system is -0.42 V versus standard hydrogen electrode, indicating moderate electron affinity. The compound does not undergo significant autoxidation at ambient conditions but may experience radical-initiated degradation at the alkyl chain. Electrochemical studies reveal irreversible oxidation waves at +1.2 V and +1.5 V versus Ag/AgCl, corresponding to oxidation of the nitrogen centers and hydroxyl group, respectively. Reducing environments generally do not affect the molecular structure, though catalytic hydrogenation under high pressure may saturate the imidazoline ring.

Synthesis and Preparation Methods

Laboratory Synthesis Routes

The synthesis of sodium lauroamphoacetate follows a well-established two-step procedure beginning with lauric acid (dodecanoic acid) and aminoethylethanolamine (AEEA). In the initial step, lauric acid reacts with AEEA at 150-160°C under nitrogen atmosphere, producing the corresponding amide intermediate. This reaction typically achieves 95% conversion after 4-6 hours with continuous removal of water. The amide subsequently undergoes intramolecular cyclization at elevated temperature (180-190°C) to form the 2-alkyl-4,5-dihydroimidazole (imidazoline) ring structure. This cyclization step requires careful temperature control to minimize decomposition and typically proceeds with 90-92% yield.

The second synthetic stage involves alkylation of the imidazoline intermediate with sodium chloroacetate. This reaction is conducted in aqueous solution at 70-80°C for 3-4 hours at pH 8-9, maintained by gradual addition of alkali. The nucleophilic ring nitrogen attacks the chloroacetate carbon, displacing chloride and forming the quaternary ammonium center with carboxylate functionality. The reaction achieves 85-88% yield, with purification accomplished through extraction with isopropanol or precipitation from acetone. Laboratory-scale purification typically employs column chromatography on silica gel with chloroform-methanol-water mixtures as eluent, followed by recrystallization from ethanol-water to obtain the pure compound as a white crystalline solid.

Industrial Production Methods

Industrial manufacturing of sodium lauroamphoacetate utilizes continuous process technology to ensure consistent quality and economic viability. The first stage employs a continuous flow reactor operating at 10-15 bar pressure and 160°C, with residence time of 2-3 hours for the amidation-cyclization sequence. Raw materials enter the system in stoichiometric ratio with 0.5% excess lauric acid to ensure complete consumption of the more expensive AEEA. The reaction mixture passes through a falling film evaporator to remove water of reaction continuously.

The alkylation stage occurs in a series of continuously stirred tank reactors with precise pH control maintained through automated addition of 50% sodium hydroxide solution. Sodium chloroacetate solution (40%) is metered into the system at 1.05 equivalents relative to imidazoline content to compensate for hydrolysis losses. Reaction temperature is maintained at 75±2°C with residence time of 4 hours. The crude product undergoes bleaching with hydrogen peroxide (1-2%) at 60°C to remove colored impurities, followed by adjustment to pH 7.0-7.5. Final concentration to 40-50% active content occurs in thin-film evaporators, with the product filtered through 5-micron cartridge filters before packaging. Annual global production exceeds 50,000 metric tons, with major manufacturing facilities located in North America, Europe, and Asia. Production costs primarily derive from raw material expenses, particularly lauric acid and sodium chloroacetate, which constitute approximately 70% of total manufacturing cost.

Analytical Methods and Characterization

Identification and Quantification

Analytical identification of sodium lauroamphoacetate employs multiple complementary techniques. High-performance liquid chromatography with evaporative light scattering detection provides reliable quantification using a C8 reversed-phase column with mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile-water containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Retention time typically falls between 8-10 minutes under gradient elution conditions. Gas chromatography with flame ionization detection may be employed after derivatization with N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide to form volatile trimethylsilyl derivatives, though this method is less preferred due to potential decomposition.

Quantitative analysis commonly utilizes potentiometric titration with sodium tetraphenylborate for the cationic component or acidimetric titration for the carboxylate functionality. Two-phase titration with mixed indicators (dimidium bromide-disulphine blue) allows determination of active content with accuracy of ±2%. Spectrophotometric methods based on complex formation with methyl orange or bromophenol blue provide rapid screening with detection limits of 0.1 mM. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy offers absolute quantification using an internal standard such as sodium benzoate, with precision of ±1% for the active ingredient content.

Purity Assessment and Quality Control

Purity assessment focuses on detection and quantification of potential impurities arising from synthesis or degradation. Primary impurities include unreacted imidazoline precursor (typically <0.5%), sodium glycolate from hydrolysis of chloroacetate (<0.3%), and the di-acetate derivative disodium lauroamphodiacetate (<2.0%). Residual aminoethylethanolamine is critically monitored due to its potential irritancy, with specifications requiring <50 ppm in final product. Chromatographic methods employing hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography effectively separate and quantify these impurities.

Quality control parameters for commercial material include active content (40±1% for liquid formulations), pH (6.5-7.5 for 10% solution), color (APHA <100), chloride content (<0.5%), and moisture content (55-58% for standard liquid concentrate). Stability testing follows accelerated protocols at 40°C and 75% relative humidity for 3 months, with acceptance criteria requiring >95% retention of active ingredient and no significant change in physicochemical properties. Microbiological specifications typically mandate total viable count <100 CFU/g and absence of specified pathogens.

Applications and Uses

Industrial and Commercial Applications

Sodium lauroamphoacetate finds extensive application in personal care formulations due to its exceptional mildness and compatibility with other surfactant systems. The compound serves as primary surfactant in baby shampoos and body washes, where its low irritation potential is particularly valued. Concentration in these applications typically ranges from 5-15% in the final formulation. The compound functions as secondary surfactant in adult personal care products, often combined with sodium lauryl ether sulfate to enhance foam quality and reduce irritation. Addition levels of 3-8% improve mildness while maintaining cleaning efficacy.

In cosmetic formulations, sodium lauroamphoacetate acts as emulsifying agent for oil-in-water systems, particularly in rinse-off products where its mildness is advantageous. The compound demonstrates synergy with nonionic surfactants, enhancing detergency and foam stability. Industrial applications include use in mild hand cleansers for occupational settings, where frequent washing necessitates low irritation potential. The compound also finds use in pet care products designed for animals with sensitive skin, typically at concentrations of 4-10%. Market analysis indicates annual growth of 3-5% in demand, driven by consumer preference for milder surfactant systems.

Research Applications and Emerging Uses

Research applications of sodium lauroamphoacetate focus on its interfacial properties and potential in specialized formulations. Investigations explore its use as stabilizer for emulsion polymerization systems, where its zwitterionic character provides electrostatic stabilization without sensitivity to pH variations. Studies examine its application in microemulsion systems for enhanced oil recovery, where its tolerance to high salinity offers advantages over conventional surfactants. The compound shows promise in pharmaceutical formulations as excipient for topical delivery systems, facilitating penetration of active ingredients while maintaining skin compatibility.

Emerging applications include use in environmentally benign cleaning formulations where the compound's ready biodegradability (80% in 28 days by OECD 301D method) and low aquatic toxicity (LC50 >100 mg/L for fish) provide regulatory advantages. Development work explores its incorporation into nanostructured lipid carriers for encapsulation of bioactive compounds, leveraging its surface activity and biocompatibility. Patent activity remains moderate with approximately 20 new patents annually referencing the compound, primarily focusing on formulation improvements rather than novel synthetic methods.

Historical Development and Discovery

The development of sodium lauroamphoacetate emerged from broader research into amphoteric surfactants that began in the 1940s with the synthesis of the first betaine-type compounds. Initial work on imidazoline-based amphoterics commenced in the 1950s, with patents filed by several chemical companies seeking milder alternatives to anionic surfactants. The specific compound sodium lauroamphoacetate was first described in the scientific literature in 1968, though commercial production did not commence until the mid-1970s following optimization of the synthesis process.

The 1980s witnessed significant expansion in applications as consumer demand for milder personal care products increased. Regulatory approval for use in cosmetic products accelerated adoption, with the compound receiving approval from major regulatory bodies worldwide. Process improvements in the 1990s focused on reducing residual AEEA content, addressing concerns about potential irritancy from byproducts. The early 21st century saw development of more concentrated forms and tailored variants with improved performance characteristics. Current research continues to refine production methods and explore new application areas while maintaining the compound's fundamental mildness properties.

Conclusion

Sodium lauroamphoacetate represents a technologically significant amphoteric surfactant with well-characterized physicochemical properties and established applications in personal care formulations. Its zwitterionic molecular structure confers unique interfacial behavior characterized by excellent mildness, compatibility with other surfactant types, and stability across a range of conditions. The compound's synthesis through well-defined chemical pathways enables production at commercial scale with consistent quality. Analytical methodologies provide comprehensive characterization and purity assessment, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Future development directions include optimization for specific application requirements, enhancement of environmental profile, and exploration of novel uses in emerging technologies while maintaining the fundamental properties that have established its utility in consumer and industrial products.

Chemical Compound Properties Database

This database contains physical properties and alternative names for thousands of chemical compounds. In chemical formula you may use:
  • Any chemical element. Capitalize the first letter in chemical symbol and use lower case for the remaining letters: Ca, Fe, Mg, Mn, S, O, H, C, N, Na, K, Cl, Al.
  • Functional groups: D, T, Ph, Me, Et, Bu, AcAc, For, Tos, Bz, TMS, tBu, Bzl, Bn, Dmg
  • parenthesis () or brackets [].
  • Common compound names.
Examples: H2O, CO2, CH4, NH3, NaCl, CaCO3, H2SO4, C6H12O6, water, carbon dioxide, methane, ammonia, sodium chloride, calcium carbonate, sulfuric acid, glucose.

The database includes melting points, boiling points, densities, and alternative names collected from various chemical sources.

What are compound properties?

Chemical compound properties include physical characteristics such as melting point, boiling point, and density, which are important for chemical identification and applications. Alternative names help identify the same compound when referenced by different naming conventions.

How to use this tool?

Enter a chemical formula (like H2O) or compound name (like water) to look up available properties and alternative names. The tool will search through the database and display any available physical properties and known alternative names for the compound.
Please let us know how we can improve this web app.
Menu Balance Molar mass Gas laws Units Chemistry tools Periodic table Chemical forum Symmetry Constants Contribute Contact us
How to cite?